Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) use different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Galaxy Camera 3G was introduced 2 years after the A390 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up against the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony A390
| Galaxy Camera 3G | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 26 months |
| Screen sizing | 4.8" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+2.1") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| A390 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony A390
| Galaxy Camera 3G | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G offers outer measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G and the A390.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera 3G and A390 is 90 and 66 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Galaxy Camera 3G and A390.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera 3G having a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer Galaxy Camera 3G should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2012-08-29 | 2010-07-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | - | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 4.8" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 0k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305g (0.67 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $606 | $500 |
