Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Galaxy Camera 3G was unveiled 3 years later than the T900 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Galaxy Camera 3G scores vs the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony T900
| Galaxy Camera 3G | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2012 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 43 months |
| Screen dimension | 4.8" |  | 3.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| T900 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony T900
| Galaxy Camera 3G | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G offers outside dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G and the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 3G and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 3G and T900.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to give greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Galaxy Camera 3G is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | - | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 4.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $606 | $300 |