Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Introduced July 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony T99, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Galaxy Camera 3G was manufactured 2 years after the T99 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Galaxy Camera 3G scores versus the T99 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony T99
| Galaxy Camera 3G | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2012 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 27 months |
| Display dimensions | 4.8" |  | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| T99 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony T99
| Galaxy Camera 3G | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G features external dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Sony T99 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony T99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G versus the T99.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Galaxy Camera 3G and T99 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 3G and T99.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to show greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern Galaxy Camera 3G provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony T99 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-08-29 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | - | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 4.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 0k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | - | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 305g (0.67 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $606 | $179 |