Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Released February 2012
- Old Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Updated by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Galaxy Camera 4G was introduced 7 months after the DP2 Merrill which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Galaxy Camera 4G scores versus the DP2 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Galaxy Camera 4G | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | February 2012 | More modern by 7 months | |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
DP2 Merrill | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Sharper screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sigma DP2 Merrill
Galaxy Camera 4G | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has outside dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Galaxy Camera 4G and the DP2 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Galaxy Camera 4G and DP2 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Galaxy Camera 4G and DP2 Merrill.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera 4G with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G will result in greater detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Galaxy Camera 4G provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-08-29 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | - | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 4.8" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 0 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640x480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $550 | $931 |