Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- New Model is Sony A99
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G versus Sony A900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Galaxy Camera 4G was announced 3 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Galaxy Camera 4G scores versus the A900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery and Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Sony A900
Galaxy Camera 4G | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | October 2008 | Fresher by 47 months | |
Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
A900 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 0k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony A900
Galaxy Camera 4G | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has outside measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G versus Sony A900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Galaxy Camera 4G versus the A900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Galaxy Camera 4G and A900 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Galaxy Camera 4G and A900.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Galaxy Camera 4G having a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony A900 will produce greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer Galaxy Camera 4G is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony A900 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | - | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) | 895 grams (1.97 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Pricing at release | $550 | $2,736 |