Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX100V
- Successor is Sony HX300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Overview
Let's look closer at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Galaxy Camera 4G was unveiled 4 months later than the HX200V which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Galaxy Camera 4G matches up against the HX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Sony HX200V
| Galaxy Camera 4G | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 4.8" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
| HX200V | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony HX200V
| Galaxy Camera 4G | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | May 2012 | Similar age |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G comes with physical dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Galaxy Camera 4G versus the HX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera 4G and HX200V is 90 and 66 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The graphic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 4G and HX200V.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony HX200V to offer you more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Portrait photography info
Sony HX200V Portrait photography info
MP count decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
offers face detect focus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Street photography highlights
Sony HX200V Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (305 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (583g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (23-481mm 20.9 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
offers tracking focus
better than average battery pack (450 shots)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Travel photography info
Sony HX200V Travel photography info
lighter than average (305 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
reasonably wide (23mm)
very long reach (481mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
better than average battery pack (450 shots)
decent sensor resolution (18MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
great reach (810mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (583 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G as a Landscape photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Landscape photography camera
reasonably wide (23mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
big screen (4.8 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
has manual focus
rather wide (27mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (18 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Vlogging with Sony HX200V
reasonably wide (23mm)
very good maximum aperture (f)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (305g)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone port
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no mic support
heavier than competitors in class (583g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-08-29 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | - | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 0 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lbs) | 583 grams (1.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 450 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $550 | $480 |