Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Introduced March 2016
- Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
- Refreshed by Sony RX10 IV
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is pretty close but the Galaxy Camera 4G (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") offer different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Galaxy Camera 4G was announced 4 years earlier than the RX10 III which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Galaxy Camera 4G matches up against the RX10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Sony RX10 III
Galaxy Camera 4G | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
RX10 III | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2016 | August 2012 | Newer by 43 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 0k | Sharper screen (+1229k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G and Sony RX10 III
Galaxy Camera 4G | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G provides outer dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check out the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Galaxy Camera 4G compared to the RX10 III.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera 4G and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 4G and RX10 III.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Galaxy Camera 4G having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX10 III will result in more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged Galaxy Camera 4G will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | - | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 4.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305 gr (0.67 lb) | 1051 gr (2.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $550 | $1,398 |