Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Also referred to as Wi-Fi
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and both are designed by Samsung. The resolution of the Galaxy Camera (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Galaxy Camera was revealed 2 years after the ST95 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Galaxy Camera grades versus the ST95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung Galaxy Camera & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Samsung ST95
| Galaxy Camera | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 | January 2011 | Newer by 26 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
| ST95 | Galaxy Camera |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Samsung ST95
| Galaxy Camera | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung Galaxy Camera offers outside dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST95 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Galaxy Camera versus the ST95.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera and ST95 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera and ST95.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you might want to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more modern Galaxy Camera is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Samsung ST95 |
| Also Known as | Wi-Fi | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-02-19 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 300 gr (0.66 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $145 |