Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released February 2013
- Alternative Name is Wi-Fi
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as ST5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Samsung Galaxy Camera versus Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Samsung. The image resolution of the Galaxy Camera (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Galaxy Camera was revealed 3 years later than the TL240 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Galaxy Camera matches up vs the TL240 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Samsung TL240
| Galaxy Camera | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 4.8" |  | 3.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
| TL240 | Galaxy Camera |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Samsung TL240
| Galaxy Camera | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera offers outer dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera versus Samsung TL240 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Galaxy Camera vs the TL240.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera and TL240.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera to result in more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger Galaxy Camera should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Samsung Galaxy Camera | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called | Wi-Fi | ST5000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-02-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 4.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 300 grams (0.66 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $171 |