Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released February 2013
- Alternate Name is Wi-Fi
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the Galaxy Camera (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the Galaxy Camera (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Galaxy Camera was launched 4 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the Galaxy Camera scores against the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung Galaxy Camera & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Sigma Quattro
Galaxy Camera | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
Quattro | Galaxy Camera | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | February 2013 | Fresher by 36 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 922k | Clearer display (+698k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma Quattro
Galaxy Camera | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung Galaxy Camera has got external dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Galaxy Camera against the Quattro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera and Quattro is 90 and 63 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Galaxy Camera and Quattro.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Galaxy Camera due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older Galaxy Camera is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma sd Quattro |
Also referred to as | Wi-Fi | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-02-19 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300g (0.66 lbs) | 625g (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $450 | $738 |