Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Also referred to as Wi-Fi
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the Galaxy Camera (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the Galaxy Camera (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Galaxy Camera was announced 4 years earlier than the Quattro H which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung Galaxy Camera being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Galaxy Camera matches up versus the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Sigma Quattro H
Galaxy Camera | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
Quattro H | Galaxy Camera | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | February 2013 | More modern by 36 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 922k | Sharper display (+698k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera and Sigma Quattro H
Galaxy Camera | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung Galaxy Camera enjoys outside dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Galaxy Camera and the Quattro H.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Galaxy Camera and Quattro H is 90 and 78 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera and Quattro H.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Galaxy Camera having a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sigma Quattro H will give you more detail with its extra 29 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged Galaxy Camera is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung Galaxy Camera | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Also Known as | Wi-Fi | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-02-19 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 45MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 4.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300 grams (0.66 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $450 | $1,134 |