Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Samsung HZ10W versus Samsung WB750, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HZ10W was announced 3 years earlier than the WB750 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the HZ10W grades vs the WB750 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ10W & Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ10W Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Samsung WB750
| HZ10W | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Samsung HZ10W
| WB750 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Samsung WB750
| HZ10W | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ10W provides outer dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Samsung HZ10W versus Samsung WB750 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the HZ10W vs the WB750.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ10W and WB750 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The visual here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ10W and WB750.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB750 to give you greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older HZ10W is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung HZ10W vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Samsung HZ10W | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ10W | Samsung WB750 |
| Also called as | WB500 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 249g (0.55 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $339 |
