Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB500
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Samsung HZ10W versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and DP3 Merrill (15MP) and the HZ10W (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ10W was manufactured 4 years earlier than the DP3 Merrill and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the HZ10W scores versus the DP3 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ10W & Sigma DP3 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ10W Gallery & Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
HZ10W | DP3 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Samsung HZ10W
DP3 Merrill | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | May 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sigma DP3 Merrill
HZ10W | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ10W has got outside measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP3 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Samsung HZ10W versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the HZ10W against the DP3 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the HZ10W and DP3 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ10W and DP3 Merrill.
Clearly, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The HZ10W because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give more detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older HZ10W is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung HZ10W | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Also referred to as | WB500 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $300 | $1,353 |