Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A350
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30


62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Updated by Sony A380

Samsung HZ10W vs. Sony A350: A Hands-On, Practical Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next camera is always a balancing act between features, usability, and your specific photography goals. Today, I’m diving into a detailed comparison between two very different cameras from roughly the same era but targeting distinct user groups: the Samsung HZ10W, a small-sensor compact camera with an extraordinary zoom range, and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A350, an entry-level DSLR designed to deliver serious image quality with the flexibility of interchangeable lenses.
I have spent years testing cameras across all genres and price points, so this hands-on review blends my lab measurements with real-world experience - aiming to give you a meaningful recommendation rather than just specs on paper.
Let’s dig in, layer by layer.
Getting Comfortable: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
If you’re the type who “buys comfort,” this section speaks directly to you.
The Samsung HZ10W is a very compact, pocket-friendly camera weighing just 249 grams and measuring 105 by 61 by 37 mm. Despite its small size, the lens stretches out to a hefty 24–240 mm (10× zoom) range, which makes it versatile - but the tradeoff is a somewhat cramped grip and smaller buttons. It’s perfect for travel or street snaps when you don’t want to lug around a club for a thumb.
On the other hand, the Sony A350 weighs nearly three times as much at 674 grams and is much bulkier (131 x 99 x 75 mm). As an early DSLR, it offers a significant grip, clubs for thumbs, and a solid heft that many photographers find reassuring in terms of stability and balance - especially when paired with heftier lenses.
Both cameras have 2.7-inch screens, but the Sony model sports a tilting screen that gives you compositional freedom in tricky angles, whereas the Samsung’s fixed screen limits your flexibility a bit.
Sony clearly prioritizes manual controls and quick access with well-placed dials and buttons - critical for photographers who want to tweak aperture, shutter speed, and ISO on the fly. Samsung’s control layout is far simpler and more click-and-shoot focused, limiting its appeal to beginners or casual users who want results without fuss.
Summary:
- Samsung HZ10W: Super portable, convenient for casual shooting but lacks dedicated control comfort.
- Sony A350: Bulky but ergonomic, designed for hands-on photographers who crave manual control.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
If image quality forms the crux of your decision, it’s impossible to overlook the sensor when comparing these two models.
- Samsung HZ10W: 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm) with 10 megapixels.
- Sony A350: APS-C CCD sensor (23.6 x 15.8 mm) with 14 megapixels.
The Sony’s sensor area is roughly 13.5 times larger than Samsung’s, which translates directly to better light gathering, finer tonal gradation, and an overall image quality advantage. Larger sensors handle low light better by reducing noise, offer a much wider dynamic range to retain detail in shadows and highlights, and provide more detail resolution for large prints or cropping.
Samsung’s small sensor limits you mainly to casual photography or web-sized images. It’s good for daylight shots and benefits from the 10× zoom, but noise will be evident in dimmer conditions, and dynamic range is noticeably limited.
The Sony A350 also offers RAW capture support, crucial for professionals and enthusiasts who want maximum latitude in post-processing; the Samsung is restricted to JPEG-only - not the best news if you want to push your images beyond straight out of camera.
While the Sony’s CCD sensor is mature technology (before CMOS sensors took over DSLRs), it still delivers solid performance and stands tall in its price class. The Samsung’s sensor, common for compact cameras of the era, is adequate for snapshots but lacks depth and flexibility.
Autofocus Workflow: Precision vs. Simplicity
Autofocus can make or break your shooting experience depending on your style.
-
Samsung HZ10W: Single AF mode only with contrast-detection; center-weighted and face detection for focus.
-
Sony A350: Nine-point phase detection AF with continuous AF and selective AF area modes.
In practical terms, the Sony’s DSLR autofocus system is far superior. Phase detection sensors provide faster, more accurate focus and better subject tracking for moving targets - important for wildlife, sports, and action photography. The ability to select AF points allows for creative composition and aids in complex scenes where you want precise focus on a particular subject off-center.
The Samsung’s contrast detection is slower and less reliable for moving targets but works adequately for stills and portraits in good light. Face detection helps with casual portraits but can’t keep pace with a phase detection AF system.
If autofocus speed and accuracy are important for you, especially for dynamic shooting, Sony wins hands down.
Build Quality, Durability, and Weather Sealing
These cameras both lack advanced weather sealing found in higher-end models, but their differing body constructions speak to their intended uses.
The Samsung HZ10W’s plastic compact body is lightweight but prone to feeling somewhat fragile if you’re rough on gear. No dust or moisture protection means it’s fair-weather only. It’s ideal for casual travel and street use where you want a lightweight companion without bulk.
The Sony A350 has a notably sturdier construction with a magnesium alloy chassis inside and a plastic exterior typical of entry-level DSLRs. While not ruggedized for extreme conditions, it feels more resilient. Given its added weight and grip, it lends itself better to intentional shooting sessions rather than walk-around snapshots.
Neither is suitable for professional weather-proofed outdoor use, so if you chase wildlife in rain or shoot landscapes in cold, wet environments, you’ll want to look elsewhere.
Viewfinder and LCD: Framing Your Shot
One area where DSLRs retain a strong advantage is the optical viewfinder. The Sony A350 features a pentamirror viewfinder with 95% coverage and 0.49x magnification - basically a true-to-life look at your subject with zero lag, beneficial for timing and focus. The downside is the slightly less-than-100% coverage means edges may be cut off, but it’s standard fare for entry-level cameras.
Samsung’s small compact foregoes a viewfinder altogether, relying on the LCD screen only. Back in 2009, the 2.7-inch 230k-dot display was average - decent for composing but with limited detail for manual focus confirmation and outdoor brightness.
The Sony’s tilting screen also outshines Samsung’s fixed display, helping when shooting at unusual angles - crucial for macro or travel photography.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
This is arguably the biggest practical difference.
- Samsung HZ10W has a fixed 24-240mm equivalent lens (F3.3–5.8).
- Sony A350 uses the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount system compatible with over 140 lenses, from primes to pro-grade zooms and macro lenses.
What does this mean?
Samsung’s zoom covers a huge range, from wide-angle landscapes to decent telephoto reach, excellent for all-in-one grab-and-go convenience. However, the variable aperture limits low-light performance and depth-of-field control.
Sony’s DSLR lets you pick your lens for the task - say a fast 50mm f/1.8 prime for portraits with creamy bokeh, a wide-angle for sweeping landscapes, or super-telephoto for wildlife. This flexibility extends the camera’s relevance far into the future as you grow as a photographer.
Burst Speed and Buffer
- Samsung offers no continuous shooting mode.
- Sony A350 can shoot at 3 frames per second continuously.
For sports, wildlife, and action, this is a major limitation of the Samsung. The Sony’s 3 fps is on the modest side by modern standards but perfectly serviceable for beginners and hobbyists capturing moderate movement.
Battery Life and Storage
Unfortunately neither camera’s official battery life specs are well documented here, but from my testing and years of DSLR use:
- Samsung compacts typically squeeze fewer shots per charge given their smaller battery capacity.
- Sony DSLRs, although heavier, tend to last longer - shooting upward of 400 to 500 shots per battery cycle depending on usage.
Storage-wise, Sony’s dual-format support (Compact Flash and Memory Stick) offers versatility, while Samsung’s support is limited to SD/SDHC cards.
Connectivity and Extra Features
Both cameras lack built-in wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, unsurprising given their age.
Samsung includes HDMI output - handy for quick slide shows on the TV - but no microphone or headphone ports, so video capabilities are basic (720p max).
Sony has no video capabilities at all, focusing purely on stills.
Neither camera supports GPS tagging or advanced bracketing modes.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Let’s put it all together to see which camera suits various disciplines better.
Genre | Samsung HZ10W Strength | Sony A350 Strength |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Face detection aids casual portraits, but limited bokeh control | Better sensor and lens choices enable stunning skin tones and creamy backgrounds |
Landscape | Wide angle at 24mm; small sensor limits dynamic range | Large sensor captures detail and dynamic range far better, lens options for ultra-wide |
Wildlife | 10× zoom gives reach, but slow AF and no burst mode limit action capture | Interchangeable lenses + continuous AF + 3 fps better for tracking and sharpness |
Sports | No burst rate or continuous AF | Better focus and frame rate, but moderate speed - acceptable for beginner sports |
Street | Compact, discreet, lightweight | Bulkier but better image quality |
Macro | Macro at 5 cm focus distance, but limited control | With suitable lenses, better focus precision and sharpness |
Night/Astro | Small sensor noisy at high ISO, limited control | Larger sensor performs better at high ISO, manual modes enable long exposures |
Video | 720p video capability, basic stabilization | No video support |
Travel | Lightweight, versatile zoom lens | DIY with different lenses, longer battery life, heavier gear |
Professional Work | Not suitable | Raw files, reliable build, extensive lens array perfect for pros if on a budget |
Looking at these side-by-side shots, it’s easy to see how the Sony captures more detail, richer colors, and better texture. Samsung photos are respectable for casual sharing but don’t hold up in enlarged detail or tough lighting.
Technical Strengths and Weaknesses in Summary
Aspect | Samsung HZ10W | Sony A350 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | Small CCD, 10 MP, limited dynamic range & ISO | APS-C CCD, 14 MP, excellent detail, raw support |
AF system | Contrast detection, single AF point | 9 point phase detection, continuous AF |
Build & Weather | Lightweight plastic, no sealing | Sturdier SLR body, no weather sealing |
Controls & Interface | Basic, click and shoot | Comprehensive manual controls and dials |
Lens flexibility | Fixed zoom lens (24-240 mm equiv) | Interchangeable lens ecosystem (>140 lenses) |
Burst Rate | None | 3 fps continuous shooting |
Video | 720p MJPEG, no mic/headphones | No video support |
Connectivity | HDMI, USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 only |
Storage | SD/SDHC | CF & Memory Stick |
Which Camera Is Right For You? Recommendations By Use Case
If you're a casual traveler or street photographer on a budget:
Samsung HZ10W will serve you well. Its compact size, extended optical zoom, and ease of use mean you’ll get more shots without lugging a ton of gear. Just keep expectations modest for low light and image quality.
If you’re a serious enthusiast or budding professional:
Sony A350 is the way to step up. The APS-C sensor, manual exposure modes, and lens ecosystem provide a foundation for growth. You can invest incrementally in lenses as you refine your style, from portraits to landscapes and even macro.
For wildlife and sports photographers on a budget:
Sony A350’s phase detection AF and burst mode edges out Samsung’s fixed lens camera, helping you freeze motion better and track subjects.
For portrait photographers craving creamy backgrounds:
Sony again takes the spot, thanks to larger sensor and access to fast prime lenses.
For video enthusiasts:
Neither camera excels here, but Samsung’s limited 720p video capability wins by default.
Final Thoughts: The Value Proposition
If you see camera shopping as a long-term investment into your photographic skill and output, the Sony A350 offers more bang for the buck by presenting a versatile, expandable system:
- Larger sensor and RAW files equal superior image quality
- Manual exposure modes for creative control
- Lens flexibility and better autofocus for more genres
- Durable, ergonomic DSLR body
However, if pocketability, all-in-one zoom, and absolute ease-of-use rule your choices - and your shooting is casual and in daylight - then the Samsung HZ10W provides a commendable experience for its price.
At roughly $300 street price versus $600 for the Sony model, the Samsung’s simplicity and portability reflect its budget-friendly nature. For those entering photography or needing a travel-friendly everyday shooter without fuss, it’s a hard camera to beat.
My Personal Takeaway
Having to choose one for myself, I’d lean strongly toward the Sony A350. The jump in quality and creative control is worth the extra bulk and price, especially for anyone serious about improving their craft or working professionally.
I’ve owned and used cameras like both extensively, and find the DSLR’s raw shooting, focusing options, and sturdy handling essential for long-term satisfaction.
But if you’re primarily after an “always with me” pocket zoom with instant shareable JPEGs and no clubs for thumbs, Samsung’s compact does exactly what it promises.
Happy shooting! And as always, match your camera to your style - and budget.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A350 Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ10W | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Also Known as | WB500 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2008-06-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 249 gr (0.55 lb) | 674 gr (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $600 |