Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
89 Imaging
52 Features
79 Overall
62
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is WB550
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 298g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched June 2015
- Older Model is Sony RX100 III
- Later Model is Sony RX100 V
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Samsung HZ15W and Sony RX100 IV, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the HZ15W (12MP) and RX100 IV (20MP) and the HZ15W (1/2.3") and RX100 IV (1") use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HZ15W was introduced 7 years earlier than the RX100 IV and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 IV being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the HZ15W scores vs the RX100 IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ15W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ15W Gallery & Sony RX100 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Sony RX100 IV
HZ15W | RX100 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 IV over the Samsung HZ15W
RX100 IV | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper display (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung HZ15W and Sony RX100 IV
HZ15W | RX100 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ15W comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sony RX100 IV has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") along with a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ15W and Sony RX100 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the HZ15W versus the RX100 IV.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the HZ15W and RX100 IV is 90 and 89 respectively.
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ15W and RX100 IV.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The HZ15W having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 IV will offer you greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older HZ15W is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ15W vs Sony RX100 IV Specifications
Samsung HZ15W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ15W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV |
Otherwise known as | WB550 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-02-23 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 16.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 249 grams (0.55 lb) | 298 grams (0.66 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 562 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $898 |