Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
89 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed May 2014
- Superseded the Sony RX100 II
- Successor is Sony RX100 IV
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Samsung HZ10W and Sony RX100 III, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and RX100 III (20MP) and the HZ10W (1/2.3") and RX100 III (1") come with different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HZ10W was released 6 years before the RX100 III and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the HZ10W grades vs the RX100 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ10W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The complete galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ10W Gallery and Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sony RX100 III
HZ10W | RX100 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Samsung HZ10W
RX100 III | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2014 | May 2009 | More recent by 60 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sony RX100 III
HZ10W | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ10W features exterior dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 III has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") and a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Compare the Samsung HZ10W and Sony RX100 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the HZ10W against the RX100 III.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ10W and RX100 III is 90 and 89 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ10W and RX100 III.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The HZ10W because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 III will show more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older HZ10W will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ10W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
Also Known as | WB500 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2014-05-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 249g (0.55 pounds) | 290g (0.64 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 495 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $300 | $748 |