Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
89 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is WB500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched October 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX100 IV
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 VI
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Samsung HZ10W and Sony RX100 V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and RX100 V (20MP) and the HZ10W (1/2.3") and RX100 V (1") use totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ10W was brought out 8 years earlier than the RX100 V and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 V being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the HZ10W grades against the RX100 V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ10W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. The entire galleries are available at Samsung HZ10W Gallery & Sony RX100 V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sony RX100 V
HZ10W | RX100 V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 V over the Samsung HZ10W
RX100 V | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2016 | May 2009 | More recent by 90 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper display (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sony RX100 V
HZ10W | RX100 V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ10W enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 V has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") and a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung HZ10W and Sony RX100 V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the HZ10W versus the RX100 V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ10W and RX100 V is 90 and 89 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ10W and RX100 V.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The HZ10W due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX100 V will give greater detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older HZ10W is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony RX100 V Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ10W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V |
Also called as | WB500 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2016-10-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 249g (0.55 lb) | 299g (0.66 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $300 | $998 |