Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also Known as WB5000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both of them are created by Samsung. The resolution of the HZ25W (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HZ25W was brought out 18 months prior to the WB150F making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the HZ25W scores vs the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ25W & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ25W Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Samsung WB150F
| HZ25W | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Samsung HZ25W
| WB150F | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ25W and Samsung WB150F
| HZ25W | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ25W has got external measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the HZ25W and the WB150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ25W and WB150F is 70 and 93 respectively.
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The photograph below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ25W and WB150F.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB150F to produce greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older HZ25W will be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Samsung HZ25W | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung HZ25W | Samsung WB150F |
| Also Known as | WB5000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.60 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 428g (0.94 lb) | 188g (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $230 |