Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Samsung HZ25W versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both of them are offered by Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the HZ25W (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe HZ25W was brought out 3 years before the WB800F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the HZ25W grades versus the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ25W and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are available at Samsung HZ25W Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Samsung WB800F
HZ25W | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung HZ25W
WB800F | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ25W and Samsung WB800F
HZ25W | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ25W has outside measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ25W versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the HZ25W and the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ25W and WB800F is 70 and 92 respectively.
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ25W and WB800F.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung WB800F to result in extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged HZ25W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ25W vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Samsung HZ25W | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung HZ25W | Samsung WB800F |
Also called as | WB5000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 gr (0.94 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $350 | $300 |