Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also Known as WB5000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Samsung HZ25W versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sigma. The image resolution of the HZ25W (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly similar but the HZ25W (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe HZ25W was brought out 19 months before the DP1 Merrill making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the HZ25W grades vs the DP1 Merrill when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ25W & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ25W Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
HZ25W | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Samsung HZ25W
DP1 Merrill | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | July 2010 | More modern by 19 months | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ25W and Sigma DP1 Merrill
HZ25W | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Samsung HZ25W enjoys external dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has specifications of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ25W versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the HZ25W versus the DP1 Merrill.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ25W and DP1 Merrill is 70 and 82 respectively.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ25W and DP1 Merrill.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The HZ25W due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will offer extra detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged HZ25W is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ25W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ25W | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung HZ25W | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also called as | WB5000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | - |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 428 grams (0.94 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $1,250 |