Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Samsung HZ25W versus Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the HZ25W (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe HZ25W was manufactured 3 years earlier than the H200 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the HZ25W grades vs the H200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ25W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are available at Samsung HZ25W Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Sony H200
HZ25W | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Samsung HZ25W
H200 | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | July 2010 | More recent by 30 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ25W and Sony H200
HZ25W | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Samsung HZ25W enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ25W versus Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the HZ25W vs the H200.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ25W and H200 is 70 and 67 respectively.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ25W and H200.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony H200 to show greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older HZ25W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ25W vs Sony H200 Specifications
Samsung HZ25W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ25W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Alternative name | WB5000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 2920 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-624mm (24.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 20cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 gr (0.94 lb) | 530 gr (1.17 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Style of battery | - | AA |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $350 | $250 |