Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Samsung HZ35W versus Samsung ST90, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact and they are both built by Samsung. The resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the ST90 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was manufactured 7 months earlier than the ST90 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST90 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the HZ35W grades versus the ST90 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W and Samsung ST90. The entire galleries are available at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Samsung ST90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung ST90
| HZ35W | ST90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST90 over the Samsung HZ35W
| ST90 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | June 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung ST90
| HZ35W | ST90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W offers physical dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung ST90 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ35W versus Samsung ST90 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the HZ35W vs the ST90.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and ST90 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and ST90.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung ST90 to produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST90 Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung ST90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung ST90 |
| Also called | WB650 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $150 |