Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as ST5000
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Samsung HZ35W versus Samsung TL240, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Samsung. The image resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was revealed 6 months after the TL240 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the HZ35W scores against the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ35W & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung TL240
HZ35W | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Samsung HZ35W
TL240 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung TL240
HZ35W | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2010 | January 2010 | Same age | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ35W has got exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Samsung HZ35W versus Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the HZ35W and the TL240.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and TL240 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The pic below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and TL240.
All in all, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung TL240 to produce more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung TL240 |
Otherwise known as | WB650 | ST5000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-11A | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $300 | $171 |