Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is WB2000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe HZ35W was launched 4 months after the TL350 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the HZ35W matches up vs the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are available at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung TL350
| HZ35W | TL350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Samsung HZ35W
| TL350 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 614k | Sharper display (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung TL350
| HZ35W | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | February 2010 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ35W features external dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the HZ35W versus the TL350.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and TL350 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ35W and TL350.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung HZ35W to give extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung TL350 |
| Otherwise known as | WB650 | WB2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 195 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $300 | $400 |