Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras and both are sold by Samsung. The resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was unveiled 13 months prior to the WB210 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the HZ35W grades versus the WB210 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB210. The full galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung WB210
| HZ35W | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 1k | Crisper screen (+613k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Samsung HZ35W
| WB210 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB210
| HZ35W | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W comes with outer measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB210 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the HZ35W versus the WB210.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The image underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ35W and WB210.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB210 to produce greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB210 |
| Also called as | WB650 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $279 |
