Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Samsung HZ35W versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and they are both offered by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ35W was revealed 4 years earlier than the WB35F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the HZ35W scores vs the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ35W & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are available at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung WB35F
| HZ35W | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Samsung HZ35W
| WB35F | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB35F
| HZ35W | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W has got physical dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Samsung HZ35W versus Samsung WB35F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the HZ35W and the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ35W and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB35F |
| Also called | WB650 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-11A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $130 |