Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and they are both created by Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe HZ35W was revealed 3 years before the WB800F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the HZ35W matches up versus the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ35W & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Samsung WB800F
| HZ35W | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung HZ35W
| WB800F | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 31 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Samsung WB800F
| HZ35W | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ35W enjoys outside measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the HZ35W against the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and WB800F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ35W and WB800F.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to give more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Samsung WB800F |
| Otherwise known as | WB650 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $300 |
