Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Announced February 2010
- Older Model is Sigma DP2
- Renewed by Sigma DP2x
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Samsung and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and DP2s (5MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and DP2s (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HZ35W was manufactured 4 months later than the DP2s so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2s being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the HZ35W grades vs the DP2s in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ35W & Sigma DP2s. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sigma DP2s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sigma DP2s
| HZ35W | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2s over the Samsung HZ35W
| DP2s | HZ35W |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sigma DP2s
| HZ35W | DP2s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W offers exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma DP2s has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") having a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the HZ35W and the DP2s.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and DP2s is 91 and 86 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and DP2s.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The HZ35W because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung HZ35W will result in extra detail due to its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP2s Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Sigma DP2s | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sigma |
| Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sigma DP2s |
| Also called | WB650 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 280 grams (0.62 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $940 |
