Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- Successor is Sony NEX-F3
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Samsung HZ35W and Sony NEX-C3, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe HZ35W was manufactured 14 months before the NEX-C3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the HZ35W scores vs the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony NEX-C3
HZ35W | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Samsung HZ35W
NEX-C3 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 14 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 614k | Crisper screen (+306k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony NEX-C3
HZ35W | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ35W enjoys exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Samsung HZ35W and Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the HZ35W and the NEX-C3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and NEX-C3 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ35W and NEX-C3.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The HZ35W featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-C3 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Also Known as | WB650 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $300 | $343 |