Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Lens-style by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was brought out 5 years earlier than the QX1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the HZ35W matches up versus the QX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ35W & Sony Alpha QX1. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony QX1
| HZ35W | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+614k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| QX1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 51 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony QX1
| HZ35W | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W enjoys external measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the HZ35W versus the QX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and QX1 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ35W and QX1.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The HZ35W due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony QX1 will result in more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Also called as | WB650 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | - |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 216g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $300 | $500 |