Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f7d/47f7d7b1e27877de843384ed6303648cfc08aee4" alt="Samsung HZ35W front Samsung HZ35W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11515/1151579478081071cc2b1eedc776984b8b96fb07" alt="Sony Alpha a6400 front Sony Alpha a6400 front"
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Announced January 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The HZ35W was introduced 9 years prior to the A6400 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the HZ35W grades against the A6400 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Alpha a6400. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony A6400
HZ35W | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Samsung HZ35W
A6400 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 104 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper screen (+308k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony A6400
HZ35W | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W offers outer dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check out the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the HZ35W and the A6400.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72512/725125b8afb5127b8a9aec734c0d29ec037c0fec" alt="Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 size comparison Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and A6400 is 91 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa681/fa681a5361a60d7e1a48ca9c89a480988dff6ac3" alt="Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and A6400.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The HZ35W using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A6400 will produce more detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older HZ35W will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41299/41299c5774c3791cbcc78cdc9dfe5a6f91ade5e1" alt="Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison"
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1db56/1db5676d1e6642c1b38ccc29bad7f52b041e9225" alt="Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Also Known as | WB650 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 32000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 403 grams (0.89 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $898 |