Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- Renewed by Sony HX300
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Samsung HZ35W and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ35W was brought out 23 months earlier than the HX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the HZ35W scores versus the HX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ35W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony HX200V
HZ35W | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Samsung HZ35W
HX200V | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | June 2010 | Fresher by 23 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 614k | Sharper screen (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony HX200V
HZ35W | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ35W enjoys exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ35W and Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the HZ35W against the HX200V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and HX200V is 91 and 66 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and HX200V.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony HX200V to produce extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older HZ35W will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Also referred to as | WB650 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 583 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $300 | $480 |