Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony HX200V
- Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ35W was manufactured 3 years earlier than the HX300 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the HZ35W grades vs the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony HX300
HZ35W | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Samsung HZ35W
HX300 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | June 2010 | More recent by 32 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 614k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony HX300
HZ35W | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ35W offers outside dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Examine the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the HZ35W versus the HX300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and HX300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The visual underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and HX300.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Sony HX300 to render extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older HZ35W will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Also called | WB650 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $339 |