Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony HX99, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) possess different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HZ35W was manufactured 9 years prior to the HX99 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the HZ35W scores vs the HX99 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The entire galleries are available at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony HX99
HZ35W | HX99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Samsung HZ35W
HX99 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | June 2010 | More recent by 99 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 614k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony HX99
HZ35W | HX99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3.00" | Identical screen measurements |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Samsung HZ35W has got physical dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Compare the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony HX99 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the HZ35W compared to the HX99.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the HZ35W and HX99 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and HX99.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The HZ35W due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony HX99 will provide greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The older HZ35W will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Also called | WB650 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2018-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.00 inches |
Screen resolution | 614k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 242 grams (0.53 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $469 |