Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Released September 2013
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and QX100 (20MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") use totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HZ35W was manufactured 4 years before the QX100 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the HZ35W grades versus the QX100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung HZ35W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony QX100
HZ35W | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 0k | Clearer screen (+614k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Samsung HZ35W
QX100 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2013 | June 2010 | More modern by 39 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony QX100
HZ35W | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ35W provides physical measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony QX100 has proportions of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the HZ35W versus the QX100.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and QX100 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the HZ35W and QX100.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The HZ35W due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony QX100 will give more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony QX100 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
Also called | WB650 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2013-09-05 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | - |
Resolution of display | 614k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | None |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $300 | $268 |