Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Released March 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
- Successor is Sony RX10 IV
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Here, we are looking at the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") have different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was manufactured 6 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the HZ35W grades versus the RX10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony RX10 III
HZ35W | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung HZ35W
RX10 III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2016 | June 2010 | More recent by 70 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 614k | Clearer display (+615k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony RX10 III
HZ35W | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ35W features external dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the HZ35W versus the RX10 III.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and RX10 III is 91 and 53 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and RX10 III.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The HZ35W featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX10 III will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Alternate name | WB650 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 1051g (2.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-11A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $1,398 |