Clicky

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37
Samsung HZ35W front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced June 2010
  • Other Name is WB650
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Released March 2016
  • Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
  • Successor is Sony RX10 IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Here, we are looking at the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") have different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The HZ35W was manufactured 6 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the HZ35W grades versus the RX10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony RX10 III

 HZ35W RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung HZ35W

 RX10 III HZ35W 
ReleasedMarch 2016June 2010More recent by 70 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k614kClearer display (+615k dot)

Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony RX10 III

 HZ35W RX10 III 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ35W features external dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Contrast the Samsung HZ35W versus Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the HZ35W versus the RX10 III.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ35W and RX10 III is 91 and 53 respectively.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and RX10 III.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The HZ35W featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX10 III will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older HZ35W is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography details
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography details
34
focusing manually
includes face detection focusing
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
71
manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Street photography advice
Sony RX10 III Street photography advice
60
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (245g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
64
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
more heavy than others in class (1,051 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Samsung HZ35W
Sports photography with Sony RX10 III
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
70
long zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (1")
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
great battery (420 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Samsung HZ35W as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
63
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (360mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
55
great battery (420 CIPA)
weather proofing
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (1,051g)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography factors
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
63
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
great battery (420 per charge)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Samsung HZ35W Vlogging info
Sony RX10 III Vlogging info
31
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than others in class (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic socket
28
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone support
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
display is not selfie friendly
more heavy than others in class (1,051g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Samsung HZ35W and Sony RX10 III
 Samsung HZ35WSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Manufacturer Samsung Sony
Model type Samsung HZ35W Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Alternate name WB650 -
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-06-16 2016-03-29
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-360mm (15.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.8 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range 3cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 614 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate - 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245g (0.54 lbs) 1051g (2.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID SLB-11A NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $300 $1,398