Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
89 Imaging
52 Features
79 Overall
62
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 298g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Released June 2015
- Old Model is Sony RX100 III
- Updated by Sony RX100 V
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and RX100 IV (20MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and RX100 IV (1") feature different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ35W was manufactured 6 years before the RX100 IV which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 IV being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the HZ35W matches up versus the RX100 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery and Sony RX100 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony RX100 IV
HZ35W | RX100 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 IV over the Samsung HZ35W
RX100 IV | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | June 2010 | More modern by 60 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 614k | Crisper display (+615k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony RX100 IV
HZ35W | RX100 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ35W offers external measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony RX100 IV has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 298 grams (0.66 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the HZ35W vs the RX100 IV.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and RX100 IV is 91 and 89 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The pic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the HZ35W and RX100 IV.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The HZ35W because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony RX100 IV will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony RX100 IV Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV |
Also called | WB650 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 614 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 16.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 298g (0.66 lb) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 562 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $898 |