Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also Known as WB650
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Revealed July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The resolution of the HZ35W (12MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HZ35W was brought out around the same time to the T99 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the HZ35W grades against the T99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony T99
| HZ35W | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Samsung HZ35W
| T99 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony T99
| HZ35W | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ35W has got outside dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the HZ35W versus the T99.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and T99 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and T99.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Sony T99 to render more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony T99 Specifications
| Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung HZ35W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
| Also called | WB650 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2010-07-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 614k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $300 | $179 |