Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2015
- Previous Model is Sony A65
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the HZ35W (12MP) and A68 (24MP) and the HZ35W (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ35W was announced 6 years earlier than the A68 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the HZ35W scores against the A68 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ35W & Sony SLT-A68. The whole galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ35W Gallery & Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Sony A68
HZ35W | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 461k | Clearer display (+153k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Samsung HZ35W
A68 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | June 2010 | Newer by 65 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Samsung HZ35W and Sony A68
HZ35W | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ35W has exterior dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A68 has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
See the Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the HZ35W versus the A68.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ35W and A68 is 91 and 64 respectively.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ35W and A68.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The HZ35W having a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony A68 will offer greater detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged HZ35W is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ35W vs Sony A68 Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sony SLT-A68 |
Also called as | WB650 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 79 |
Cross focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 610g (1.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 510 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $300 | $581 |