Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
![Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-HZ50W/Samsung-HZ50W-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB50F front Samsung WB50F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB50F/Samsung-WB50F-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Additionally Known as WB5500
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both of them are manufactured by Samsung. The sensor resolution of the HZ50W (14MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The HZ50W was introduced 4 years before the WB50F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the HZ50W matches up against the WB50F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ50W & Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung HZ50W Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Samsung WB50F
HZ50W | WB50F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Samsung HZ50W
WB50F | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ50W and Samsung WB50F
HZ50W | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ50W has got exterior dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the HZ50W versus the WB50F.
![Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F size comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-HZ50W-vs-Samsung-WB50F-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ50W and WB50F is 70 and 92 respectively.
![Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-HZ50W-vs-Samsung-WB50F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The photograph here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the HZ50W and WB50F.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB50F to resolve extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The older HZ50W is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-HZ50W-vs-Samsung-WB50F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-HZ50W-vs-Samsung-WB50F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Samsung HZ50W | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung HZ50W | Samsung WB50F |
Also called | WB5500 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-05-03 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.60 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-11A | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $250 | $180 |