Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Also Known as WB5500
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Samsung HZ50W versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras and both of them are sold by Samsung. The resolution of the HZ50W (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HZ50W was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the HZ50W matches up vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ50W & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung HZ50W Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Samsung WB800F
| HZ50W | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung HZ50W
| WB800F | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | May 2010 | More modern by 32 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ50W and Samsung WB800F
| HZ50W | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ50W provides external measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung HZ50W versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the HZ50W and the WB800F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the HZ50W and WB800F is 70 and 92 respectively.
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the HZ50W and WB800F.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to give you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged HZ50W is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung HZ50W vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung HZ50W | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung HZ50W | Samsung WB800F |
| Also referred to as | WB5500 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-05-03 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426g (0.94 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $250 | $300 |