Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aaf5/5aaf587e29a179629037a7974702d099625cbb1e" alt="Sony Alpha A3000 front Sony Alpha A3000 front"
69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Newer Model is Sony a3500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Samsung HZ50W and Sony A3000, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the HZ50W (14MP) and A3000 (20MP) and the HZ50W (1/2.3") and A3000 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The HZ50W was launched 4 years before the A3000 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the HZ50W scores versus the A3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ50W & Sony Alpha A3000. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung HZ50W Gallery & Sony A3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Sony A3000
HZ50W | A3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Samsung HZ50W
A3000 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | ![]() | May 2010 | Newer by 40 months |
Common features in the Samsung HZ50W and Sony A3000
HZ50W | A3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Samsung HZ50W provides outside measurements of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony A3000 has dimensions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Samsung HZ50W and Sony A3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the HZ50W compared to the A3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26589/26589e51a8fa47983e5f1fe0fb85f65330a11d2d" alt="Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 size comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ50W and A3000 is 70 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e430/7e43014b937f33b048d3c8ae89c4d32847e1f132" alt="Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison"
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ50W and A3000.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The HZ50W because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A3000 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged HZ50W is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eafad/eafad81d70e77ecae6344f35e378e8b210995688" alt="Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison"
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6471/f64712e690721122daf402812aa73931bbc4a813" alt="Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A3000 Specifications
Samsung HZ50W | Sony Alpha A3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ50W | Sony Alpha A3000 |
Alternate name | WB5500 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-05-03 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, H.264, MP4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lb) | 411g (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1068 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $250 | $398 |