Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5500
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced June 2010
- Previous Model is Sony A230
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Samsung HZ50W and Sony A290, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the HZ50W (14MP) and the A290 (14MP) is very close but the HZ50W (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe HZ50W was brought out at a similar time to the A290 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the HZ50W scores vs the A290 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ50W and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The entire galleries are provided at Samsung HZ50W Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Sony A290
| HZ50W | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Samsung HZ50W
| A290 | HZ50W |
|---|
Common features in the Samsung HZ50W and Sony A290
| HZ50W | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung HZ50W features exterior dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Samsung HZ50W and Sony A290 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the HZ50W vs the A290.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HZ50W and A290 is 70 and 66 respectively.
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ50W and A290.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The HZ50W comes with the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF trickier.
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Samsung HZ50W | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung HZ50W | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Other name | WB5500 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-05-03 | 2010-06-09 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.60 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 pounds) | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $250 | $600 |