Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Also Known as WB5500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Photography Glossary Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the HZ50W (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe HZ50W was unveiled 15 months after the T900 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the HZ50W matches up vs the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung HZ50W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Samsung HZ50W Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Sony T900
| HZ50W | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung HZ50W
| T900 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ50W and Sony T900
| HZ50W | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ50W offers outer dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the HZ50W vs the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HZ50W and T900 is 70 and 96 respectively.
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ50W and T900.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung HZ50W to result in more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern HZ50W provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung HZ50W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung HZ50W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Also called as | WB5500 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-05-03 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.60 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-11A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $300 |