Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
67 Imaging
55 Features
80 Overall
65
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Announced September 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released August 2010
- New Model is Sony A57
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Samsung MV800 versus Sony A55, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the MV800 (16MP) and the A55 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the MV800 (1/2.3") and A55 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe MV800 was introduced 13 months later than the A55 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the MV800 scores vs the A55 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung MV800 and Sony SLT-A55. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung MV800 Gallery and Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Sony A55
| MV800 | A55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 | August 2010 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Samsung MV800
| A55 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Samsung MV800 and Sony A55
| MV800 | A55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung MV800 offers outer dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sony A55 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
See the Samsung MV800 versus Sony A55 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the MV800 vs the A55.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the MV800 and A55 is 97 and 67 respectively.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the MV800 and A55.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The MV800 uses the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult. The fresher MV800 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Samsung MV800 vs Sony A55 Specifications
| Samsung MV800 | Sony SLT-A55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung MV800 | Sony SLT-A55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2011-09-01 | 2010-08-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 gr (0.27 lb) | 500 gr (1.10 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 816 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Micro SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $499 | $800 |