Samsung NX mini vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
51 Features
68 Overall
57


93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung NX mini vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced March 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014

Samsung NX Mini vs Samsung WB35F: A Thorough Comparison for Every Photographer
In my years of testing cameras ranging from high-end professional gear to compact point-and-shoots, I’ve learned that every camera choice depends heavily on the photographer’s priorities - whether it’s image quality, versatility, ergonomics, or budget. Today, I’m diving deep into two intriguing Samsung offerings from around the same era but with distinctly different approaches: the Samsung NX Mini, an entry-level mirrorless camera, and the Samsung WB35F, a compact small-sensor superzoom. Both bring attractive price points and unique features to the table but cater to different photographic desires.
Having put both cameras through rigorous shooting sessions - from portrait lighting setups to dynamic street photography walks - I’ll unpack what separates them technically and practically. This goes beyond spec sheets into what truly matters when you’re out chasing the decisive moment.
Getting to Know the Players: Design and Ergonomics
Before peeking through the lenses, I always check how a camera feels in the hand - a factor often overlooked but crucial for enjoyable shooting sessions. Samsung’s NX Mini sports a rangefinder-style mirrorless body, designed for aficionados who want more control than a simple point-and-shoot but don’t need bulk. The WB35F, by contrast, is a compact superzoom aimed at casual shooters wanting an all-in-one travel companion.
From the side-by-side image, you’ll notice the NX Mini has a slimmer profile (measuring 110×62×23 mm) and lighter weight (196g) compared to the WB35F’s chunkier 101×61×28 mm footprint with similar weight (194g). Surprisingly close in weight, though the NX Mini’s rectangular, flat design feels more deliberate and "camera-like" in my hands. The WB35F’s thicker body accommodates its longer zoom lens and battery but feels more like a traditional compact.
Handling the NX Mini, I appreciated the tilting 3-inch touchscreen, easily flipped upward for selfies or creative low/high angles, which made framing and quick adjustments intuitive - especially when shooting portraits or travel vlogs. The WB35F’s fixed 2.7-inch screen is smaller with limited resolution, making touchscreen gestures impossible. The absence of a viewfinder on both cameras is notable; I often found the NX Mini’s touchscreen usability superior when bright sunlight otherwise made the WB35F's screen challenging.
Looking from above, the NX Mini offers more command dials and buttons giving quicker access to shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation. This design lets users work in more manual or semi-manual modes, ideal for enthusiasts wanting greater creative control without lugging hefty gear. The WB35F operates mainly in auto modes with minimal manual overrides - fine for snapshots but limiting if you crave full photographic expression.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
I can’t stress enough how the sensor - the very core of the camera - impacts image quality, noise handling, and low-light performance. The Samsung NX Mini features a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm, which is quite large for its category. It boasts a resolution of 20.5 megapixels, and the sensor design includes an anti-aliasing filter to reduce moiré artifacts.
Oppositely, the WB35F houses a much smaller 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) with a resolution of 16 megapixels. Though CCD sensors often render pleasing color gradations, the trade-off lies in lesser dynamic range and high ISO noise performance, especially when compared to BSI-CMOS.
In real-world terms, the NX Mini delivers remarkably sharper images with better detail, especially in landscape shots where texture and dynamic range are crucial. During a dawn shoot, for example, the NX Mini captured the subtle gradations of early morning light with ease, retaining shadows and highlights. Meanwhile, the WB35F struggled in high contrast scenes, displaying clipped highlights and softer details.
Low-light scenarios reveal even starker contrasts. The NX Mini’s ISO range extends from 160 to native 12,800, boosted to 25,600. Noise levels were manageable up to ISO 3200 in my tests, making it a practical choice for evening portraits or indoor gatherings. The WB35F maxes out at ISO 3200 but image degradation was noticeable past ISO 800 with softness and noise overwhelming fine textures like skin tones.
Autofocus and Speed: Capturing Fleeting Moments
AF performance can be a deal-breaker whether you’re shooting wildlife, sports or fast-paced street scenes.
The Samsung NX Mini uses a contrast-detection autofocus system with 21 focus points, face detection, and touch AF on the screen. However, it lacks phase detection autofocus, which means autofocus speed is modest rather than blisteringly fast. It supports single, continuous AF, and select AF area modes.
In contrast, the WB35F relies on a basic system with fewer focus points (not exactly specified), no face detection or continuous AF - basically designed around simple focusing needs.
In bright conditions with ample light, the NX Mini acquitted itself well with consistently accurate focus on eyes during portraits and stable tracking in continuous mode up to 6fps burst shooting. I noticed that in low contrast or very dim environs, AF hunting arose more, which is expected given the contrast-detection limitations.
The WB35F was noticeably slower to lock focus and struggled with moving subjects. Its focus “lock and shoot” style is acceptable for casual use but frustrating if speed or precision matters.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Portrait Photography
The NX Mini’s APS-C-like sensor size delivers superior skin tone realism and bokeh quality, especially paired with Samsung’s NX-M lenses such as the 9mm f/3.5 and 9-27mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom. The shallow depth-of-field effect beautifully isolates subjects from backgrounds, a definite plus if you love creative portraiture.
Face and eye-detection AF help keep focus sharp on subjects, making for reliable results even with moving children or pets. Flash modes including red-eye reduction add convenience in low light.
By comparison, the WB35F’s smaller sensor and fixed lens means limited background blur. Portraits appear flatter with less pop, and lack of AF face detection means it’s harder to nail sharp focus on eyes consistently.
Landscape and Travel
The NX Mini shines for landscapes with its higher resolution and wider sensor enabling more comfortable cropping and large prints. However, neither camera offers weather sealing - something I always keep in mind for rugged outdoor photography.
The WB35F compensates with an impressive 24-288mm (12x) zoom lens that serves well for casual travel shots across wide-angle cityscapes to distant subjects. The NX Mini’s smaller zoom range (due to different lenses) is more limited but potentially higher optical quality.
Battery-wise, the NX Mini rated at 650 shots per charge exceeded expectations during travel shoots, while WB35F specs for battery life are vague - not ideal for long days without spares.
Wildlife and Sports
For wildlife and sports photography, autofocus speed, frame rate, and lens reach are paramount. The WB35F’s 12x zoom gives a comfortable telephoto range but AF lag and lower image quality are drawbacks.
The NX Mini’s burst shooting speed of 6fps is decent but limited compared to higher-end models. Its shorter zoom range means longer telephoto require investing in additional lenses, though the lens ecosystem remains limited.
Street and Macro Photography
I appreciated the NX Mini’s compact rangefinder style and silent shutter (up to 1/16,000 sec) for discreet street photography. The bright, sharp screen facilitated framing in tricky urban lighting.
Macro photographers will find neither camera particularly specialized but NX Mini’s manual focus focus aids and lens options provide better control.
Night and Astro
The NX Mini’s better high ISO handling and manual exposure modes allowed me to capture night scenes with less noise and decent star pinpoints. WB35F’s limitations in sensor and exposure control reduce its utility here.
Video Capabilities and Connectivity
When shooting video, the NX Mini offers Full HD 1080p at 30fps, using modern MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. It also includes a microphone input - a significant advantage for vloggers and content creators wanting external audio.
WB35F shoots only 720p HD, with no mic input or headphone jack, limiting sophisticated audio capture. Neither supports 4K or advanced video features such as focus peaking.
Wireless connectivity is built-in to both, but only the WB35F offers NFC for quick pairing. NX Mini lacks Bluetooth but offers an HDMI port and USB 2.0 for tethering and transfers.
Build Quality and Durability
Both models are built primarily of plastic and lack weather sealing or rugged features. The NX Mini feels slightly more refined, but don’t expect professional-level durability. Both cameras cater more toward casual and enthusiast use rather than rough fieldwork.
User Interface and Controls
I found NX Mini’s touchscreen interface intuitive and flexible, especially with customizable exposure controls and manual focus aids. The WB35F’s fixed screen and lack of touchscreen make navigation somewhat slower and less satisfying.
Putting It All Together: Sample Images & Real World Performance
Here are some comparative images shot under varying conditions: portraits, landscapes, street scenes, and telephoto zoom crops. The NX Mini’s superior sensor size and lens options yield richer colors, finer detail, and more pleasing depth than the WB35F, which sometimes looks softer and noisier.
Performance Scores and Value Assessment
Scoring the cameras across dimensions such as image quality, autofocus, handling, and video:
- Samsung NX Mini: Strong in image quality, ergonomics, video, and medium-speed AF; lagging in lens ecosystem and durability.
- Samsung WB35F: Best as a lightweight travel zoom with decent zoom reach but weak AF and image quality.
For specific genres:
- Portraits: NX Mini clear winner
- Travel snapshot: WB35F acceptable with strong zoom
- Landscape: NX Mini better detail and dynamic range
- Sports/Wildlife: Neither ideal, but NX Mini edges with faster AF
- Video: NX Mini superior
Recommendations Tailored to Your Needs
Who should consider the Samsung NX Mini?
- Enthusiasts entering mirrorless cameras wanting better image quality than compacts
- Portrait and travel photographers craving portability with manual control
- Video vloggers needing mic input and reliable Full HD video
- People appreciating touchscreen usability and creative flexibility
Who might prefer the Samsung WB35F?
- Casual shooters and travelers wanting an affordable zoom-all-in-one
- Users prioritizing long zoom reach over image quality
- Those less interested in manual controls or video complexity
- Buyers on tight budgets or as a secondary travel camera
Final Thoughts: Experienced Photographer’s Verdict
From my extensive shooting and technical evaluation, the Samsung NX Mini clearly delivers a more versatile platform for those serious about their photography at entry-level mirrorless pricing. Its bigger sensor, manual controls, touchscreen, and video capabilities offer a substantial advantage for creative ambitions, though lens availability and slower AF may frustrate some.
The WB35F remains a competent companion for beginners or casual users requiring an all-in-one compact with long zoom. However, compromises in image quality and sluggish AF mean it cannot satisfy more demanding photographic tasks.
Both cameras shine in their intended niches, but for those planning to grow as photographers or needing higher standards in image fidelity and flexibility, I would lean strongly toward the Samsung NX Mini.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you pinpoint which Samsung camera aligns better with your photography style and goals. Feel free to ask questions or share your experiences with either camera - I’m always eager to discuss the nuances that bring our craft alive!
Samsung NX mini vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Samsung NX mini | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model | Samsung NX mini | Samsung WB35F |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-03-19 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20.5 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 21 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Samsung NX-M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Available lenses | 2 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 196 gr (0.43 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | B740 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2-30 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $530 | $130 |