Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photography Glossary Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras and they are both produced by Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SL202 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB30F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the SL202 scores vs the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are provided at Samsung SL202 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB30F
| SL202 | WB30F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Samsung SL202
| WB30F | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB30F
| SL202 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL202 has external measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB30F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the SL202 compared to the WB30F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SL202 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and WB30F.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older SL202 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB30F |
| Also Known as | PL50 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168g (0.37 lb) | 128g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $140 | $180 |