Samsung NX200 vs NX500: A Mirrorless Tale of Two Generations

Samsung's foray into the mirrorless camera market is an intriguing chapter often overlooked today, yet the NX200 and NX500 models stand as clear markers of rapid evolution in sensor tech, user interface, and sheer imaging prowess. As someone who's logged hundreds of hours shooting and vetting cameras in this segment, I find these two siblings from Samsung’s NX line excellent case studies - the NX200 embodying the early promise of affordable APS-C mirrorless with a distinctive OLED display, and the NX500 representing a leap forward with new sensor architecture and 4K video capability.

If you're pondering which Samsung NX to invest in or simply curious about the practical differences between a 2012 and 2015 entry-level mirrorless, this detailed comparison - complete with real-world tests, expert sensor digs, and balanced takeaways - should steer your decision with clarity.

Size, Feel, and Handling - The Tactile Dance of Design

Let’s start with what your hands and fingers meet first: the camera body. The NX200 is delightfully compact, leaning into a discreet rangefinder-style form factor that’s easy to pocket or sling on a strap. Measuring 117x63x36 mm and tipping the scales at a feather-light 223g, it truly feels like a camera made for spontaneous street shots, quick grab-and-go landscapes, or casual family portraits.

The NX500, although still in the rangefinder mould, grows a bit more substantial at 120x64x43 mm and 287g - not a heavyweight by any stretch but noticeably beefier in hand. This extra mass comes with a slightly more robust grip and more room for controls, offering improved ergonomics during longer shoots or with heavier lenses.

Both cameras lack the weather sealing some competing systems provide, which isn't surprising given their entry-level positioning - so neither is ideal for torrential downpours or gritty adventure work without extra protection.

Ergonomics-wise, the NX500’s added heft pays dividends: better button placement (more on that shortly), a tilting screen, and a touchscreen, features absent on the NX200. The NX200’s design is minimalist, which pleases purists but can frustrate quick menu navigation.

The Control Suite - How Samsung Evolved the User Interface

Examining the top decks and control layouts reveals how Samsung iterated on usability between the generations. The NX200 keeps things simple with a fixed 3-inch OLED screen boasting a modest resolution of 614k dots but no touchscreen functionality. It offers fundamental shooting modes with dials and buttons geared towards newcomers comfortable with aperture and shutter priority modes.

The NX500 introduces a tilting 3-inch LCD with a sharper 1,036k dots and, importantly, touchscreen input. This drastically streamlines live view focusing and menu navigation - a godsend in dynamic shooting scenarios.

Here’s a look at their top controls side by side:

Samsung kept external flashes optional on both, requiring you to invest in a hot shoe-mounted model for fill or creative lighting. Both cameras forego built-in viewfinders, nudging users toward composing on the rear screen (which feels natural with touch support on the NX500).

Summary: while the NX200’s control suite suits beginners craving simplicity, the NX500’s upgrades show Samsung's commitment to improved ergonomics, making it more appealing to enthusiasts demanding speed and control.

The Heart of the Matter - Sensors and Image Quality Unpacked

Now we’re diving into the engine bay - the sensor, the image processor, and all the wizardry Samsung packed inside. This is where differences become far more pronounced beyond size.

The NX200 sports a 20.3MP APS-C CMOS sensor with a conventional front-illuminated design and an anti-aliasing filter. This sensor offers a solid 5472x3648 maximum resolution, with a native ISO range of 100–12800. Its overall DxO Mark score is 69, reflecting useful color depth (22.6 bits), dynamic range (12.6 EV), and usable ISO up to 618.

The NX500 steps up significantly: a 28MP APS-C BSI-CMOS sensor without an anti-aliasing filter, boosting sharpness and resolution to an impressive 6480x4320 pixels. This model expands the ISO range to 100–25600 native, with extended sensitivity up to 51200 and an overall DxO score of 87 - a leap worthy of note. Color depth improves to 24.8 bits, dynamic range to 13.9 EV, and low-light ISO usability nearly doubles (ISO 1379).

Both cameras share the same sensor size (23.5x15.7 mm), which helps maintain a consistent field of view across NX mount lenses with their 1.5x crop factor. But technology evolution is evident in the NX500’s sensor - back-illuminated for better light gathering - crucial for enhancing both noise performance and detail.

To test these differences, I ran both cameras through standardized ISO and color charts, plus real-world urban/nighttime scenes. Results aligned with the specs: NX500 images retain finer texture in shadows and highlights, and colors feel more nuanced and natural, especially under tricky light.

The absence of an anti-aliasing filter on the NX500 sharpens fine detail but introduces a slight risk of moiré on patterned subjects - a familiar trade-off found in many modern high-res sensors.

Flicks and Scrolls - The Backscreen and Interface Experience

While composing images is crucial, the partnership between a good screen and an intuitive interface can elevate or frustrate a photographer’s workflow.

The NX200 brought a pioneer moment with its 3-inch fixed Active Matrix OLED panel, a rarity of its time, offering vivid contrast and excellent viewing angles. Unfortunately, its 614k-dot resolution feels a bit low by today’s standards.

The NX500 innovated further with a tilting 3-inch LCD screen boasting a far cleaner 1,036k-dot panel plus full touchscreen control, akin to smartphone interaction. This made not only focusing on detail easier but also reviewing images and tweaking settings on the fly.

In my field tests, the NX500’s touchscreen was an underrated joy - focusing with a tap or dragging across the scene was swift and reliable, especially in live view mode. The NX200’s fixed screen demanded more physical button navigation, which slowed down operation during action or street shooting.

Real-World Image Gallery - What Do Photos from Each Look Like?

Theory is one thing, but images are the final arbiter. To get a sense of capabilities, I captured an eclectic set of photos using identical NX mount primes to avoid lens variations:

• Portrait sessions indoors with mixed tungsten and daylight
• Landscape vistas under golden hour light
• Wildlife at a local nature reserve (using a telephoto zoom)
• Urban street photography after dusk
• Macro shots of flowers and insects
• Night sky shots targeting stars

Here’s a curated side-by-side gallery that captures these tests:

Samsung NX200 screen back Samsung NX500 front Samsung NX500 screen back

The NX500's higher resolution sensor, lack of AA filter, and advanced processor provide sharper, cleaner images with more subtle gradations in highlight and shadow detail. Portraits look more natural with richer skin tones, better eye detection, and smoother bokeh transitions thanks to faster AF and more focus points.

For landscapes, the wider dynamic range captures more cloud texture and foreground detail. The NX200 holds up admirably but shows early signs of noise creeping beyond ISO 800, which the NX500 pushes to ISO 1600 and beyond with relative peace.

Autofocus Showdown - Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking

Autofocus is pivotal, especially for wildlife, sports, and fast-moving street scenes. The NX200 relies on contrast-detection autofocus with 15 focus points and face detection but no phase detection, which can feel laggy or hunt in lower light or fast action.

The NX500 upgrades to a hybrid AF system with 209 focus points, including phase detection - a huge advantage for speed and accuracy. This also brings continuous AF tracking for moving subjects, making it vastly superior for sports or wildlife photographers.

In live testing, the NX500 nailed fast-moving birds with a reliable burst speed of 9 fps and maintained impressive focus lock. Meanwhile, the NX200, while decent, occasionally struggled to keep pace and would hunt notably indoors or in dim settings.

Burst Rates and Shutter Speeds - Freezing the Moment

A camera that can’t keep up is a camera you miss shots with - period.

The NX200 maxes out at 7 fps and a shutter speed max of 1/4000 sec, sufficient for many casual sports and street photographers but limiting if you’re chasing super-fast action.

The NX500 goes further with 9 fps continuous shooting and a faster max shutter speed of 1/6000 sec, allowing for better freezing of blazing action or wide apertures in bright daylight.

This difference matters especially for wildlife shooters or photographers capturing kids and pets running wild.

Video Capability - From Basic Clips to 4K Footage

Video functionality reflects a camera’s versatility for hybrid shooters and social media-minded pros.

The NX200 offers Full HD 1080p at 30 fps and HD 720p at 60 fps, using MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. It lacks image stabilization and any 4K options, keeping video-arounds-basic but respectable for the time.

The NX500 elevates the game considerably, sporting 4K UHD video at 30p and Cinema 4K (4096x2160) at 24p, plus 1080p up to 60 fps. Video is encoded with the modern HEVC/H.265 codec, offering efficient compression but requiring newer editing software.

I found the NX500’s video quality surprisingly sharp and usable, with crisp detail and smooth color reproduction. The absence of in-body stabilization isn’t ideal, but optical stabilization on some NX lenses compensates somewhat.

Neither camera offers microphone inputs, limiting audio options for serious videographers, nor headphone jacks for monitoring.

Specialized Photography Disciplines - How Do They Stack Up?

Let's break down how each camera holds up across common photographic genres - trust me, having the right tool is half the battle.

Portrait Photography

The NX500's face detection AF, expanded focus points, and better resolution conjure sharper portraits with lively, flattering skin tones. The high-res sensor and lack of AA filter give palpable microcontrast that brings out textures - like eyelashes and hair strands - without unnatural sharpening.

The NX200, while adequate, sometimes softens skin tones due to its older sensor and is less agile at locking focus on eyes, which can frustrate portrait work.

Landscape Photography

The NX500’s superior dynamic range lets you retain more sky details and nuanced shadows in tricky light, producing files ripe for heavy editing. Its 28MP resolution boosts fine detail in landscapes and architecture shots.

The NX200 still shines in good light but falls short when pushing files, with slightly muddied shadows past ISO 800.

Wildlife Photography

Thanks to fast 9 fps shooting, hybrid autofocus with phase detection, and better ISO handling, the NX500 dominates here. Its ability to track animals in motion beats the NX200’s slower, contrast-only AF.

Sports Photography

Similar story as wildlife: the NX500’s speed and focusing are simply better equipped to nail decisive moments.

Street Photography

Here, the lighter, smaller NX200 has an edge for stealth and convenience, despite its more limited autofocus. It’s easier to be discreet with this little camera but suffers in low light.

The NX500’s improvements in ISO and focusing help sharp images in evenings, though it’s a tad less pocketable.

Macro Photography

Lens choice matters most, but the NX500’s higher resolution sensor captures more detail, while its AF system is quicker at locking onto tiny subjects.

Night and Astro Photography

The NX500 offers extended ISO and improved noise control, a ticket to better starry skies and urban night shots. NX200’s sensor caps out earlier in noise tolerance, and its older tech doesn’t fare as well in near-dark conditions.

Video Usage

The NX500 is clearly the winner here with 4K, touch focus, and higher frame rates. The NX200 is serviceable but basic.

Travel Photography

Compact size and weight plus decent battery life (330 shots NX200, 370 NX500) make both good travel partners. The NX200’s lower weight helps, but the NX500's versatility and better imaging justify the slight weight penalty on longer trips.

Professional Workflows

Neither camera is a flagship, but the NX500’s sharper files and broader raw support integrate better in professional post-production environments.

Build Quality, Battery, and Connectivity

Build-wise, both cameras use plastic shells without weather sealing, so treat these as gentle hands cameras.

Battery life is slightly better on the NX500 (370 shots vs. NX200’s 330), which can save frustration on long shoots or travel.

Connectivity is another highlight where NX500 shines - built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, and Bluetooth allow instant sharing and remote control, modern amenities the NX200 lacks entirely.

Lens Ecosystem - The Samsung NX Mount Niche

Both share support for the Samsung NX mount, with approximately 32 lenses available ranging from wide-angle primes to telephoto zooms and macro options. While not as extensive as Sony’s or Canon’s APS-C ecosystems, the lineup offers decent choices for most genres.

The NX500’s advanced autofocus benefits more from newer lens designs optimized for its hybrid phase-detect system than the NX200’s simpler AF can exploit.

Price and Value - Which Gives More Bang for Your Buck?

Surprisingly, current street pricing for the NX200 (~$818) and NX500 (~$800) are quite close despite the three-year gap and technological differences.

Considering image quality, video, autofocus, and features, the NX500 represents significantly better value for enthusiasts and semi-pros willing to invest slightly more for future-proofing.

The NX200 may appeal to collectors, beginners watching their budget, or those craving compactness and simplicity.

Final Scores by Category and Use Case

A useful perspective comes from aggregating their strengths for specific photography disciplines:

And here’s an overall performance snapshot reflecting sensor and usability features:

Wrapping It Up - My Recommendations Based on Experience

The Samsung NX200 is a charming camera - small, sharp, and deserving credit for bringing OLED screens to mirrorless early on. It suits photographers who prize portability, straightforward controls, and entry-level pricing. Good for casual family shooting, walk-around street photography in well-lit conditions, and those nostalgic for early 2010's tech charm.

The Samsung NX500, on the other hand, is a genuine evolution - marrying a high-res, back-illuminated sensor with fast hybrid autofocus, 4K video, and wireless connectivity. For enthusiasts and semi-professional shooters craving performance and versatility without stepping into the full-frame stratosphere, it’s a capable, future-ready choice. Its strengths shine especially for portraits, wildlife, low-light scenes, and video work.

If I were to pick a daily driver for diverse photography, the NX500 wins hands down. No contest.

A Few Final Thoughts on Samsung’s Mirrorless Legacy

Though Samsung exited the camera market, their NX line, and especially models like the NX200 and NX500, remain interesting milestones. They showcase rapid sensor and usability progress and highlight how quickly camera tech progressed in the mirrorless realm over just a few years.

If you stumble across either on the used market, assess your needs carefully. The NX500 offers genuinely competitive results and features for a budget APS-C model, while the NX200 may be best reserved for those who value size and OLED novelty.

Buying a camera is always about balancing your priorities - weight, speed, image quality, and budget. With these two, you get two very different takes on mirrorless entry-level goodness. Choose wisely, and have fun out there capturing your best shots!

Hope you enjoyed this deep dive - feel free to share your experiences with these models or ask questions in the comments!

End of article.