Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III
Portability
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Portability
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced February 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX100
- Renewed by Samsung NX210
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Released March 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX10 II
- Renewed by Sony RX10 IV
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Samsung NX200 and Sony RX10 III, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Samsung and Sony. The sensor resolution of the NX200 (20MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very similar but the NX200 (APS-C) and RX10 III (1") have totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe NX200 was revealed 5 years prior to the RX10 III and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the NX200 grades against the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung NX200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The full galleries are provided at Samsung NX200 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Sony RX10 III
| NX200 | RX10 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung NX200
| RX10 III | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2016 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1229k |  | 614k | Clearer display (+615k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung NX200 and Sony RX10 III
| NX200 | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Samsung NX200 enjoys physical dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Look at the Samsung NX200 and Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the NX200 versus the RX10 III.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the NX200 and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.
Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the NX200 and RX10 III.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The NX200 offers the larger sensor which is going to make achieving bokeh easier. The older NX200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung NX200 Portrait photography advice
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography advice
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW files
you can focus manually
decent MP (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
has face detect focus
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung NX200 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competitors (223g)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
supports RAW files
environment proofing
heavier than competition (1,051g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung NX200 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Sports photography camera
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
excellent zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
has tracking focus
environment proofing
better than average battery pack (420 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Samsung NX200
Travel photography with Sony RX10 III
lighter than competitors (223 grams)
decent megapixels (20MP)
missing Timelapse function
does not posses selfie friendly screen
better than average battery pack (420 per charge)
environment proofing
decent MP (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (1,051 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung NX200 Landscape photography features
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography features
has manual focus
change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
supports RAW files
environment proofing
better than average battery pack (420 shots)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung NX200 Vlogging advice
Sony RX10 III Vlogging advice
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (223g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
missing external microphone support
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic jack
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
does not have selfie friendly screen
heavier than competition (1,051g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung NX200 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
| Samsung NX200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung NX200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-02-28 | 2016-03-29 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 15 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 32 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 614k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223g (0.49 pounds) | 1051g (2.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 69 | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.6 | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.6 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 618 | 472 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 420 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BC1030 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $818 | $1,398 |