Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Successor is Samsung NX210
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Samsung NX200 versus Sony T900, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Samsung and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the NX200 (20MP) and T900 (12MP) and the NX200 (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe NX200 was revealed 3 years after the T900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the NX200 matches up vs the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung NX200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Samsung NX200 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Sony T900
| NX200 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Samsung NX200
| T900 | NX200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Samsung NX200 and Sony T900
| NX200 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung NX200 features outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Samsung NX200 versus Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the NX200 vs the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the NX200 and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The picture here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the NX200 and T900.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The NX200 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung NX200 will deliver greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher NX200 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung NX200 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Samsung NX200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung NX200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2012-02-28 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 15 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Total lenses | 32 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 614k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 223 gr (0.49 lbs) | 143 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 618 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BC1030 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $818 | $300 |